How exactly does the body recognize EMF and fight against it?

Navigation sense for animals, birds, fish and humans was discovered explained and publish in research conducted in last century. In brain of mentioned above creatures is navigation system responding to geomagnetic field of the earth. Humans lost most of it in evolution process.  We evolved to use other senses and our brain is more advanced, so navigation sense is not very important anymore. Some people are able to use remaining part of it for navigation in forests etc (pathfinders . . .).

Unfortunately this ability works again us. This very specific navigation system (or remaining part of it in every human being) senses very specific part of man-made and natural EMFs. It triggers intruder alarm and defence system tries to fight them.

Practically this is it. Results may be bad like developing variety of health problems due to lack of energy used for this fight and involved in it e.g. “special forces” designated to catch and destroy cancer cells. The list of symptoms of exposition to EMFs and solution is here.

My Invention succeeded in removing part of EMFs triggering defence system to fight with them. As results all type of the problems related to explained earlier conditions can be easily reverse.  Adrenal Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome or Fibromyalgia (they are not chronic any more – they can be defeat) are an example of many health problems we can successfully deal with.

How long we will be foolish by officials about EMFs!

Most of the research conducted by scientists is owned by corporation.

What it means?

Research must answer on the specific question based on chosen factors using scientifically known method. Everything is correct accept “chosen factors”.

He will say no if you would like to ask your kid about drugs he took specifying the time frame e.g. at school and answer will be correct, because he had drugs after school.

The same is with EMF impact on health research. Scientists use very limited number of factors. Automatically research results are inconsistent.  Conclusion – “it is no evidence supporting EMF negative influence on health”.

Correct – yes indeed!

This negligence is initially planned by big money owing devastating our and our kids’ life EMF resources.

Ask any of those scientists if have been taken under consideration during research following boundary conditions (factors) determining exposition to electromagnetic radiation impact on man’s life like:

  • level of immune system
  • stress level
  • diet
  • natural radiation exposition in conjunction with man-made
  • in living area at home
  • especially in bedroom
  • exposition in workplace
  • total daily sum of radiation subjects are exposed too
  • sleep pattern (responsible for vital energy regeneration)

They are only a sample of conditions should be taken under consideration during research to have thorough results.

Number of key authority people and institutions deny that EMFs are harmful. For peace of mind are set up EMF safety boundary.

With that comes one simple question.

Why they are different for different countries, states and provinces if it is so clear about that what is safe or not?

We are looking for decent research confirmed by environment safety regulations.

We are not convinced by today regulations especially that our children are exposed to Wi-Fi radiation at schools.

What impact this negligence will have on our offspring future? In future someone will say “sorry”. This is not enough.

Number of smart meters, wireless devices and sources of EMFs is growing exponentially daily.

In mean time here is solution for protecting us and our family until future official actions may be initiated.

Are EMFs harmless or harmful?

Recently one of my articles introducing to impact of EMFs on health was commented.

Cited – “There are limits imposed by the government because certain electromagnetic radiation wavelengths are ionizing radiation (such as gamma waves, X-rays, and high-frequency ultraviolet light), and these can cause damage to DNA and cells in the human body, which can cause cancer. These limits are debated because the amount of ionizing radiation one can be exposed to before guaranteeing cancer is not a definite amount, and varies from population to population. Wavelengths used for WiFi and cellular are non-ionizing, and cannot cause cancer or other health problems.”

All thesis are explained in “What is in the Background?” in this blog.

As much as I respect critical and constructive comment I was shock by closed minded author’s statement.

Putting on side humans reaction to all type EMFs proved number of times by researchers and victims’ testimonials is another area mostly abandon – it is the future of our children.

What author of that comment said is a typical propaganda without any evidence. Ask people suffering from Wi-Fi and Cellular radiation about it. It is to many different research and testimonial to be ignored. Not only DNA damage can be in background of cancer. Also it is a number of acute, chronic and severe health problems and with direct links to mentioned type of radiation.

Additionally if it is so clear why each country has different limits for this type of radiation? Why plants in gardens and on farmers fields surrounding Cell Towers go to be brownish just after they are power on? Why so many people suffer from exposition to Wi-Fi, Smart meter and Cell Tower radiation?

Of course for people defending such procedures it is simple – those people are faking and is no evidence for anything they are saying. It is as usually blind justice in the hands of “big money”.

What he can say on front of the people developing permanent disability, suffering chronic pain, not even talking about worst ones. What about animals and plants – they suffer in silence begging us for help.

Those slogans are circulating for recent years ignoring statistical data collected in many countries. Do you know that in Sweden number of EHS (electro hypersensitive) people is highest in the world. This country was one of the first to install Cell Tower network in 1970. Now it covers over 70% of the country. Why honey bee population is vanishing? Why so many pets and animals need to be treated by vets regardless of humans health problems?

What about schools? What about teachers who are not able to do the job, students having problems with memory, focusing and concentration? What about fertility of recent students in future? Of course – Wi-Fi and Cellular radiation is harmless isn’t it? What about breast cancer developed in the brae area where females put cell phone using it as a holder?

What about quality of vegetation we are eating? Why it is not enough vitamins and nutrition in it?

It is just a tip of the problems.

Yes all of the non ionizing radiation could be harmless – you should check “What is in the Background?” last section “Solution”